Are You Ready to Enter this World ... of Design?

Designomics: from the Latin designare “mark out, devise,” and Greek nomos “managing.”

The question of how the universe came into existence, and how life appeared within it, has fascinated thinking people since the arrival of humans on earth.

The discussions on this website are profound, sometimes technical, but the basic message is simple: the concept of intentional precise order and arrangement involved in the gradual development of the earth, and life upon it, is everywhere around us. And its study is both fascinating and rewarding.

Where this evidence ultimately leads . . . is up to you to decide!

Intentional Order and Arrangement

Note the first three images displayed below. Which of them would you say *does not* manifest evidence of intentional ord e r and arrangement?

Unlock the Secrets: Decode This!

The first image is a simplistic human figure using a basic pattern of 90 black and white squares. It was sent into deep space by a team of scientists in 1974.

Along with some other shapes, it was intended to prove to would-be aliens potentially listening (or rather, watching) somewhere in deep space, that it was designed and transmitted by an intelligent race of beings, that it originated from an intelligent source.

Would you agree this qualifies as intentional order and arrangement?

For more details, see the Arecibo page.

A Primitive "Caveman" Tool

This is a tool fashioned from a piece of flint, like many unearthed at numerous dig sites around the world.

Scientists at times send these artefacts to a museum as they present evidence that intelligent humans intentionally fashioned the stone for use as a tool!

But how would you rate the comparison of this construction to the design of the human tooth? Would you conclude that the crudely designed flint was the product of intentional and purposeful design, and that, by contrast, the human tooth is merely a product of trillions of contiguous undirected serendipitous events?

Technical note: these "serendipitous events" refer to developments, growths, that happen by chance (the throw of a dice), so that a process evolutionists refer to as "natural selection" can occur -- but this means that selection takes place from many events that have accidentally occurred, i.e. without intentional order or arrangement!

What do you think?

A Miniature City: The Living Cell

This image is an artist's representation of the interior of a human cell.

There are around 40 trillion of these (40,000,000,000,000) in the average human. And they all function cooperatively for the good of the entire body.

The cell contains every item of information required to build a complete human, and each one includes billions of fully functioning microscopic organic machines.

Did you know that if you were to unravel a single strand of DNA from the centre of a cell, it would stretch to nearly 2 meters in length? Astonishingly, if all the DNA in a human body were laid end-to-end, it would span well over a thousand times the distance from Earth to the Sun. And yet, DNA is incredibly thin — 40,000 times *thinner* than a human hair!

Evolutionists believe the living cell was not the product of intentional precise order and arrangement, but developed by means of an undirected selection process from a series of immensely long (and fortuitous) contiguous serendipitous events.

When you compare the expertise, preparation, design work, and ingenuity that went into the development of the impressive "Arecibo image" on the one hand, with the finished product of the complex cell as illustrated above... what is your opinion?

Is this not also evidence for intentional order and arrangement?

Which Is the Odd One Out?

Of these three items, which would you say was the odd one out?

How many of these items portrayed here seems to you to bear evidence of having been designed, and clearly fits the category of "intentional precise order and arrangement"?

According to exponents of the theory of evolution, the item that is the odd one out happens to be by far the most complex -- the human cell. . .

++++++++++

But the cell is unique to evolutionists, not because of its impressive design features, functionality, and complexity, but because, in their opinion, it is said to be the only item here that was not the product of intentional precise order and arrangement!

++++++++++

Although the "scientific consensus" is that evolution is the preferred option. . .

What is your conclusion?

There was an error submitting your message. Please try again.

Thank you! We will get back to you as soon as possible.

Contact me

Email: designomics at outlook dot com

Note: This site has been created with the MyWebSite system from ionos.co.uk including its AI capability, and with assistance from Microsoft's Copilot AI system.