The human capacity for unlimited creativity and design is manifest in what we have achieved, but is also evident in what we can achieve; and this capacity mirrors what we observe around us.
The world is brimming with books on the theory of evolution and the "survival of the fittest," and there is no shortage of teachers on the topic.
- But does evolution truly possess the robust foundational support that many people believe it does?
- Are there any holes or gaps in the theory that would render it unworkable?
- Does it fully satisfy the established scientific process?
- And how much of this theory is derived from empirical evidence (that is, "verifiable by observation, experience, or experimental procedure")?
Do these questions really matter?
Well, yes, I believe they do. If you believe in improving the quality of your life, and extending it, they may well be the most important questions you could consider.
This website deals with the principle "holes," the inadequacies and failures of the theory. It uses verified science and supporting references from internationally-renowned scientists along with up-to-date findings.
If you support evolution, or perhaps teach it, then the articles contained here may present you with a challenge!
Do you believe that the theory is firmly grounded in logical, verifiable data and sound argumentation? You may wish to prove (at least to yourself) whether there are sound, reasonable refutations to the facts, logical discussions, and the lines of reasoning in the accompanying articles on this website.
Is it Time for a New Approach?
Did you know . . . ?
In 583 BCE, a solar eclipse helped to end a battle between the Medes and the Lydians, who took the darkness to be an omen.
What do
Scientists Say?
Mutations: The "Raw
Materials" for Evolution
Mutations — radical changes to living organisms at the genetic level — are said to be the “source of raw materials for evolution.”
And molecular biologist Jacques Monod once said regarding mutations: “With that, the mechanism of Darwinism is at last securely founded, and man has to realize that he is a mere accident.”
But is it really "securely founded"? Scientists hold conflicting views on this. The late Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould, a defender of evolution, once extolled Theodosius Dobzhansky as “the greatest evolutionist of our century.” However, Dobzhansky said regarding mutations that they “usually show deterioration, breakdown, or disappearance of some organs. . . . " He continued: "Many mutations are, in fact, lethal to their possessors. Mutants which equal the normal fly in vigor are a minority, and mutants that would make a major improvement of the normal organization in the normal environments are unknown.”
The considerable lengths of time claimed by evolutionists that were involved in multiple gradual evolutionary changes, ought to have left behind sufficient evidence of these changes, if mutations were as common as its supporters indicate. But the available evidence does not support his. Mutations are "lethal," and required major changes are "unknown."
See the article 'Mutations: "Raw Materials" for Evolution'
Other topics considered on this website:
Intentional Order and Arrangement
Note the first three images displayed below. Which of them would you say does not manifest evidence of intentional order and arrangement?
(1) A Coded Message from Earth
The first image is a simplistic human figure using a basic pattern of 90 black and white squares. It was sent into deep space by a team of scientists in 1974.
Along with some other shapes, it was intended to prove to would-be aliens potentially listening (or rather, watching) somewhere in deep space, that it was designed and transmitted by an intelligent race of beings, that it originated from an intelligent source.
Would you agree that this qualifies as intentional order and arrangement?
For more details, see the Arecibo page.
(2) A Primitive Crafted Device
This is a tool fashioned from a piece of flint, like many that have been unearthed at numerous dig sites around the world.
Scientists at times send these artefacts to a museum as they present evidence that intelligent humans intentionally fashioned the stone for use as a tool!
But how would you rate the achievement of this construction when compared to the design of the human tooth? Would you conclude that the crudely designed flint was the product of intentional and purposeful design, but that, by contrast, the human tooth is merely a result of trillions of contiguous undirected serendipitous events?
What do you think?
(3) A Mini Metropolis: The Living Cell
This image is an artist's representation of the interior of a human cell.
There are around 40 trillion of these (40,000,000,000,000) that make up the average-sized human body. And they all function cooperatively for the good of the entire body.
Did you know that every cell in your body (with the one exception of erythrocytes) builds and maintains billions of microscopic organic machines?
[See the article 'Metropolis' The Living Cell.]
When you compare the expertise, preparation, design work, and ingenuity that went into the development of the impressive 'Arecibo image' (the Coded Message from Earth) by scientists, with the intricate and highly complex human cell, one cannot help but marvel at the sophistication of its design.
While the Arecibo image showcases human creativity and intelligence, the human cell exemplifies a level of complexity, order, and precision that has no equal in human creations.
Would you agree that this also qualifies as intentional order and arrangement?
Which Is the Odd One Out?
Of the three items illustrated here, which would you say was the odd one out?
How many of these items portrayed here fit the category of "intentional precise order and arrangement"?
According to exponents of the theory of evolution, the item that is the odd one out happens to be by far the most complex — the human cell. . .
+ + + + + + + + + +
But the cell seems to be unique to evolutionists, not because of its impressive design features, functionality, and complexity, but because, in their opinion, it is the only one of these three items that was not the product of intentional precise order and arrangement!
+ + + + + + + + + +
What is your conclusion?
Contact me
Email: designomics at outlook dot com
(Apologies, the email address is formatted this way to try and fool the robots that produce spam!)
Copyright © 2024, 2025, Michael A. Barber, Designomics™ — All the text and the images on this website are protected by copyright laws in multiple countries. All rights reserved.
Note: This site was created with the MyWebSite system from ionos.co.uk, including its AI capability, and with some images generated by the Copilot AI system.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.