Design is Universal
Are You Ready to Enter a New World ... of Design?
Designomics: from the Latin designare “mark out, devise,” and Greek nomos “managing.”
The question of how the universe came into existence, and how life appeared within it, has fascinated thinking people since the arrival of humans on earth.
The discussions on this website are profound, sometimes technical, but the basic message is simple: the concept of intentional precise order and arrangement involved in the gradual development of the earth, and life upon it, is everywhere around us. And its study is both fascinating and rewarding.
Where this evidence ultimately leads . . . is up to you to decide!
Intentional Order and Arrangement
Note the first three images displayed below. Which of them would you say *does not* manifest evidence of intentional design?
Unlock the Secrets: Decode This!
The first image is a simplistic human figure using a basic pattern of just 90 black and white squares. It was sent into deep space (using a series of "on/off" signals) by a team of scientists in 1974, including the late Carl Sagan, using the Arecibo radio telescope (no longer in service).
It was intended to prove to would-be aliens potentially listening (or rather, watching) somewhere in deep space, that it was designed and transmitted by an intelligent race of beings, that it originated from an intelligent source.
Would you agree this qualifies as intentional order and arrangement?
A Primitive "Caveman" Tool
This is a tool fashioned from a piece of flint, like many unearthed at numerous dig sites around the world.
Scientists at times send these artefacts to a museum as they present evidence that intelligent humans intentionally fashioned the stone for use as a tool!
But how would you rate the comparison of this construction to the design of the human tooth? Would you conclude that the crudely designed flint was the product of intentional and purposeful design, and that, by contrast, the human tooth is merely a product of trillions of contiguous undirected serendipitous events?
Technical note: the "serendipitous events" refer to developments, growths, that happen by chance (the throw of a dice), so that a process evolutionists refer to as "natural selection" can occur -- but this means selection from many events that have accidentally occurred, i.e. without intentional order or arrangement!
What do you think?
A Miniature City: The Cell
This image is an artist's representation of the interior of a human cell.
This contains all the information to build a complete human being.
There are around 40 trillion of these (40,000,000,000,000) in the average human (but, incidentally, if you were to open out a single strand of one DNA molecule from the centre of the cell, it would measure almost 2 meters long)! And all these cells function cooperatively for the good of the entire body.
Evolutionists believe the living cell was not the product of intentional precise order and arrangement, but developed by means of an undirected selection process from a series of immensely long (and fortuitous) contiguous serendipitous events.
When you compare the expertise, preparation, design work, and sheer ingenuity that went into the development of the impressive "Arecibo image" on the one hand, with the finished product of the complex cell as illustrated above... what is your opinion?
Is this not also evidence for intentional order and arrangement?
Which Is the Odd One Out?
Of these three items, which would you say was the odd one out?
How many of these items portrayed here seems to you to bear evidence of having been designed, and clearly fits the category of "intentional precise order and arrangement"?
According to exponents of the theory of evolution, the item that is the odd one out happens to be by far the most complex -- the human cell...
But this item (the cell) is unique to evolutionists, not because of its impressive design features, functionality, and complexity, but because, in their opinion, it is said to be the only item here that was not the product of intentional precise order and arrangement!
Although the "scientific consensus" is that evolution is the preferred option...
What is your conclusion?
Contact me
Email: designomics@outlook.com
© Copyright 2024, Michael A. Barber. All rights reserved.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.