Saturday 12-July-2025
The human capacity for unlimited creativity and design achievements is evident in what we have achieved and can achieve; and this capacity mirrors what we observe around us!
A New Approach
The world is brimming with books on the theory of Evolution and the "survival of the fittest," and there is no shortage of teachers on the topic.
But how much of the theory is really derived from empirical evidence (that is, "verifiable by observation, experience, or experimental procedure")?
Does this question really matter?
This website weighs the popular supporting arguments for Evolution as it delves into the perceived shortcomings of the theory. It draws upon verified scientific data and supporting references from internationally renowned scientists, incorporating the latest findings to reinforce key concepts and scrutinize the reasoning used by proponents of evolutionary theory. Importantly, the site does not reference religious tenets or advocate Creationist beliefs. Instead, the articles rely on sound reasoning, authenticated science, and coherent logic to present an alternative perspective.
The articles include a new approach to the subject of Evolution, using many considerations you will probably not find elsewhere.
For those who support Evolution, or perhaps teach it, then these articles will no doubt present something of a challenge!
Enquirers are invited to assess whether credible and rational counterarguments exist that could successfully challenge the points raised on this website.
Did you know . . . ?
Insects account for over half of all known species of creatures on earth. There are an estimated 3 million insect species, with beetles alone making up nearly 400,000 of them. Individual ants are estimated to number between 10 to 20 quadrillion globally. That’s roughly 2.5 million ants for every human! How does evolution account for such diversity on this tiny unique planet?
Some of the topics considered on this website:
What Do the Facts Say?
Many Parts — One Purpose!
The article 'Multiple Distinct Laws — One Function' employs a selection of examples highlighting distinct "laws" (parameters or attributes) of physics and of nature that work together to fulfil a single purpose.
In each case the examples describe many parts — but only one intended function!
How did Evolution manage to coordinate these? In so many examples, too many to list fully, even if one part is missing, or fails to work adequately, the overall function would not be fulfilled!
And if the function is missing, the fine balance of nature would be significantly affected with consequences ranging from a universe that is unable to provide a comfortable existence for its occupants, to one that is incapable of nurturing or supporting life at all.
How could the goalless process of Evolution coordinate these complex and distinct functions to satisfy the multiple requirements of a universe well-suited for earth, and an earth well-suited for life?
Furthermore, each of the examples demonstrates order, arrangement, purpose, even forward planning.
The challenge is clearly presented for Evolution to produce every complex, organised function without losing the balance and order manifest in nature.
In what way is the theory of "natural selection" deficient in explaining these phenomena? For those who believe that Evolution is now firmly established in mainstream science, the article 'Multiple Distinct Laws — One Function' will be a rewarding read!
What do
Scientists Say?
Mutations: The "Raw
Materials" for Evolution?
Mutations — radical changes to living organisms at the genetic level — are said to be the “source of raw materials for Evolution.”
Molecular biologist Jacques Monod once said regarding mutations: “With that, the mechanism of Darwinism is at last securely founded, and man has to realize that he is a mere accident.”
But is this view of mutations really "securely founded"? Scientists hold conflicting views on this, even among Evolution's greatest supporters. The considerable lengths of time claimed by Evolutionists for the numerous gradual evolutionary changes, ought to have left behind sufficient evidence of these changes, if meaningful mutations were as common as its supporters indicate. But, as the accompanying article demonstrates, the available evidence fails to support this.
Intentional Order and Arrangement
Note the first three images displayed below. Which of them would you say does not manifest evidence of intentional order and arrangement?
(1) A Coded Message from Earth
The first image is a simplistic human figure using a basic pattern of 90 black and white squares. It was sent into deep space by a team of scientists in 1974.
Along with some other shapes, it was intended to prove to would-be aliens potentially listening (or rather, watching) somewhere in deep space, that it was designed and transmitted by an intelligent race of beings, that it originated from an intelligent source.
Would you agree that this qualifies as intentional order and arrangement?
For more details, see the Arecibo page.
(2) A Primitive Crafted Device
This is a tool fashioned from a piece of flint, like many that have been unearthed at numerous dig sites around the world.
Scientists at times send these artefacts to a museum as they present evidence that they were intentionally fashioned for use as a tool!
But how would you rate the achievement of this construction when compared to the design of the human tooth? Would you conclude that the crudely designed flint was the product of intentional and purposeful design, but that, by contrast, the human tooth is merely a result of trillions of contiguous undirected serendipitous events?
What do you think?
(3) A Mini Metropolis: The Living Cell
This image is an artist's representation of the interior of a human cell.
There are around 40 trillion of these (40,000,000,000,000) that make up the average-sized person's body. And they all function cooperatively for the good of the entire body.
Did you know that every cell in your body (with the one exception of specialised red blood cells) builds and maintains billions of microscopic organic machines?
[See the article 'Metropolis' The Living Cell.]
When you compare the expertise, preparation, design work, and ingenuity that went into the development of the impressive 'Arecibo image' (the Coded Message from Earth) by scientists, with the intricate and highly complex human cell, one cannot help but marvel at the sophistication of its design.
While the Arecibo image showcases human creativity and intelligence, the human cell exemplifies a level of complexity, order, and precision that has no equal in human creations.
Would you agree that this also qualifies as intentional order and arrangement?
Which Is the Odd One Out?
Of the three items illustrated here, which would you say was the odd one out?
How many of these items portrayed here fit the category of "intentional precise order and arrangement"?
According to exponents of the theory of Evolution, the item that is the odd one out happens to be by far the most complex and intelligently arranged — the human cell. . .
+ + + + + + + + + +
But the cell seems to be unique to Evolutionists, not because of its impressive design features, functionality, and well-arranged complexity, but because, in their opinion, it is the only one of these three items that was not the product of intentional precise order and arrangement!
+ + + + + + + + + +
What is your conclusion?
Contact me
Email: designomics at outlook dot com
(Apologies, the email address is formatted this way to try and fool the robots that produce spam!)