Primitive tools are said to be "evidence" of intentional order and arrangement, and are displayed in museums.
What evidence does the far superior crafting of the human tooth provide? Does this not indicate intentional order and design?
According to Physicist Sir Roger Penrose, the chance of arriving at our finely tuned universe randomly, is a mere one in 10^10^123
And this number is vastly greater than all the atoms in the universe!
One human body = A mind-boggling 7 octillion atoms.
Some people have a superb set of teeth, as for example this young woman pictured here.
But how did the human body come to have this specific arrangement of ivories?
Deliberately Crafted Artefact
When archaeologists find a flint at a dig site, with a particular shape, a sharp edge, and a smooth hand-grip neatly chiselled, do they not conclude that this is a deliberately crafted artefact, with clear evidence of intentional order and arrangement, with the result that the item is thereafter kept on display in a museum?
Notice the accompanying illustrations of the arrangement of teeth within the mouth. Do you suppose that each tooth originally came about over considerable time one tooth after another, coincidentally growing in the precisely ideal location; or by contrast do you think they were all created spontaneously in a single spurt of fortuitous growth? Evolutionists say they resulted from millions of years of gradually improving conditions that finally gave rise to the ideal layout characteristic of all humans.
Does the arrangement, placement, width, length, quality, and usefulness of each tooth indicate intentional design to you?
Or did each tooth just happen to sprout up (in a long series of serendipitous events) in the appropriate place, with its specific quality of hardness, its specially fashioned sharp (but not over-sharp) edge and its ideal matching size; and in the course of time this sprouting activity managed to complete the familiar half-moon arrangement within the upper mouth cavity, including pairs of teeth that happen to match, tooth-by-tooth, on both sides of the mouth; and then, in the same fashion, the lower-jaw teeth sprang up in neat succession one after another, to complement their counterparts in the upper jaw?
A Billion Consecutive Serendipitous Events?
Does that sound like "sheer luck" to you?
Did these features happen by chance, consecutively, over considerable time, so that they could be "selected" as superior, in favour of other growths (as Darwin's theory of "natural selection" proposes)? Or is it more reminiscent of good foresight and coordinated planning?
Evolutionary scientists respond to the above argumentation by asserting that this arrangement of human teeth came about by "a genetically programmed pattern" . . . !
The question therefore has to be asked: Where did this "programming" come from to produce this ideal arrangement? A computer programmer spends months or even years on a single, relatively simply, application, tracking down and fixing "bugs" in the code, to finally arrive at an adequate product. (For example, note this list of bugs in a well-known computer game. See also the section below that describes The Cyberpunk 2077 Computer Game "Bugs".)
But computer-designed applications are the result of "intentional" design performed with a purpose; a specific, required end result.
Further Questions
But the questions do not end here. How does the Darwinian argument account for, not only the above, but also for the convenient situation of:
Does evolution possess qualities capable of coordinated planning and purposeful design?
Technical Note (sorry, not for Technophobes)
The above heading 'A Billion Consecutive Serendipitous Events' may appear at first to be an exaggeration. However, note that the average human tooth is composed of 53 x 10^21 atoms; that is, a single tooth.
This is a number with 21 zeros following it; in other words: 53 thousand billion billion (53 000 000 000 000 000 000 000). Each one of these atoms and molecules would therefore require to be in the correct place and possess all of the many precise properties to collectively form this one tooth.
Plus, of course, this same "serendipitous" arrangement would need to be repeated for every individual tooth, except that the "arrangement" needs to be slightly altered to suit the purpose of each tooth, depending on its required function.
Does this indicate intentional design to you?
And this same argumentation can be repeated for all of the human body's multiple functions: food digestion, reproduction, immune system, repair, blood circulation, respiration, brain signal transport, endocrine activity, integumentary (skin) functions, waste disposal, lymphatic system, sensory system, metabolic processes, etc . . . .
And this requires organising 7 octillion atoms (the total number of atoms in the average human body). This is a number followed by 27 zeros, or 7 x 10^27, or, seven thousand trillion trillion, or 7 billion billion billion.
Or, put another way: 7 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
. . . Intentional order and arrangement? . . .
One notable example of a considerable programming effort that resulted in an application full of bugs is the launch of the video game Cyberpunk 2077. Developed by CD Projekt Red, the game was highly anticipated and had a massive development budget and team behind it. However, upon its release in December 2020, it was plagued with numerous bugs and performance issues.
The problems were so severe that Sony even removed the game from its PlayStation™ Store for a period, and CD Projekt Red offered refunds to dissatisfied customers. Despite the extensive effort and resources invested in its development, the game required numerous patches and updates to address the myriad of issues reported by players.
This example highlights how even significant programming efforts can result in applications with multiple serious problems. Hence, proper testing and quality assurance processes are required to be thoroughly implemented to ultimately provide a finished product.
This underscores the dilemma of the Darwinian evolutionist, who is faced, not merely with immense complexity, but with organised complexity and intentional order and arrangement.
Copyright © 2024, Michael A. Barber, Designomics™ — All rights reserved.
Note: This site has been created with the MyWebSite system from ionos.co.uk, including its AI capability, and with assistance from the Copilot AI system.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.